Skip to main content
· 2/22/1985

Morgan v. SOUTH CENT. BELL TELEPHONE CO.

Citations

  • 466 So. 2d 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the three primary considerations are “(1) the nature of the defendant’s activity; (2) the relationship between the parties; and (3) the type of injury or harm threatened”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Embry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.