Morgan v. Regents of the University of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding in a retaliatory discharge claim that the employer's knowledge of the employee's conduct is essential to establishing causation
• emphasizing a plaintiff must show incoherencies or other contradictions in the employer’s proffered legitimate reasons for its action
• finding in a retaliatory discharge claim that the employer’s knowledge of the employee’s conduct is essential to establishing causation
• express finding at the arbitration of plaintiffs grievance that layoff was not result of discrimination or retaliation entitled to collateral estoppel effect
• to establish a prima facie case of retaliation, the employee must show “that the employer was aware that the plaintiff had engaged in the protected activity”
• first quoting Jordan 23 v. Clark, 847 F.2d 1368, 1376 (9th Cir. 1988); and then citing Fisher v. San Pedro 24 Peninsula Hosp., 262 Cal. Rptr. 842, 856 (Ct. App. 1989)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).