Morgan v. Pennsylvania General Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the purpose of the complaint is to give notice of the nature of the claim
• explaining that the test of cause-in-fact in negligence actions is the substantial factor standard
• discussing the historic evolution of the term \proximate cause\ and the public policy factors used to limit tort liability
• discussing the historic evolution of the term \proximate cause\ and the public policy factors used to limit tort liability
• citing, e.g., Coffey v. Milwaukee, 74 Wis.2d 526, 537, 247 N.W.2d 132 (1976); Antoniewicz v. Reszczynski, 70 Wis.2d 836, 857, 236 N.W.2d 1 (1975); A.E. Inv. Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc., 62 Wis.2d 479, 484-85, 214 N.W.2d 764 (1974)
• citing, e.g., Coffey v. Milwaukee, 74 Wis. 2d 526, 537, 247 N.W.2d 132 (1976); Antoniewicz v. Reszczynski, 70 Wis. 2d 836, 857, 236 N.W.2d 1 (1975); A.E. Inv. Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc., 62 Wis. 2d 479, 484-85, 214 N.W.2d 764 (1974)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).