Skip to main content
· 10/6/2006

Morgan v. Morgensen

Citations

  • 465 F.3d 1041
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 25028
  • 2006 WL 2846367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that “[a] prisoner 13 claiming an Eighth Amendment violation must show (1) that the deprivation he suffered was 14 ‘objectively, sufficiently serious,…”
  • finding an Eighth Amendment claim where officials 3 || ordered plaintiff to operate a dangerously defective printing press
  • finding an inmate’s Eighth Amendment right to be clearly established despite a split in authority among the circuits
  • finding 14 || prison’s order to work dangerously defective printing press constituted an exacerbating 15 || condition
  • finding prison’s 8 ||order to work dangerously defective printing press would constitute an exacerbating 9 || condition
  • finding a constitutional violation 5 where an inmate alerted his supervisor to a dangerous defect in the equipment he was using 6 as part of his prison employment and he was ordered to continue working with the defective 7 equipment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, McKeown, Clifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.