Connecticut Appellate Court· 12/25/2012
Morgan v. Morgan
Citations
- 139 Conn. App. 808
- 57 A.3d 790
- 2012 Conn. App. LEXIS 616
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding mootness question on basis of fact not disputed by parties on appeal
- plaintiff's sale of real property to nonparty during pendency of appeal rendered moot her challenge to order requiring sale of property because sale could not be undone
- plaintiff’s sale of real property to nonparty during pendency of appeal rendered moot her challenge to order requiring sale of property because sale could not be undone
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beach, Gruendel, Sheldon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Giaimo v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-14· cited 81×
- Bhatia v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-06-24· cited 77×
- Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-06-27· cited 51×
- Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-02-26· cited 38×
- Patterson v. Council on Probate Judicial ConductSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-07-10· cited 21×
- Hogan v. LagoszConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-10-26· cited 15×
- Fiddelman v. RedmonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-08-22· cited 9×
- Norton v. BoyleSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2001-03-16· cited 7×
- Mercer v. StrangeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-06-20· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.