Morgan v. Gay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under CAFA, the party seeking removal bears the burden of establishing the requisite amount in controversy
• holding that under CAFA, the party seeking removal bears the burden of establishing the requisite amount in controversy
• noting that we “need not look to legislative history at all when the text of the statute is unambiguous”
• noting that the district court granted a motion to stay an order to remand a class action
• “Under CAFA, the party seeking to remove the case to federal court bears the burden to establish that the amount in controversy is satisfied.”
• where plaintiff “permitted by state laws ” pleads damages under jurisdictional minimum, removing party must prove jurisdictional facts to legal certainty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).