Skip to main content
· 4/5/1989

Morgan Distributing Company, Inc. v. Unidynamic Corporation (Formerly Known as Umc Industries, Inc.)

Citations

  • 868 F.2d 992
  • 1989 WL 15825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that one complaint, alleging one breach of a fran-' chise agreement, and another complaint, alleging a related breach of the same agreement, created different actions for purposes of Rule 15(c)
  • noting that a complaint cannot be amended by a brief in opposition to a motion to dismiss
  • pointing out that a responsive brief is neither the time nor the place to raise a new claim
  • observing that Rule 15’s “plain language makes clear that it applies not to the filing of a new complaint, but to the filing of an amendment stating a claim which arose ‘out of the conduct set forth in the original pleading’”
  • pointing out that a responsive brief is neither the time nor the place to raise a new claim
  • pointing out that a responsive brief is neither the time nor the place to raise a new claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Bowman, Henley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.