Moresi v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming because “the jury was adequately informed that the defendants bore the burden of proving any alternative theories of causation that they presented”
• even if testimony was erroneously excluded, it was harmless error because the testimony would have been cumulative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).