Skip to main content
· 5/18/2000

Moreno v. Crookston Times Printing Co.

Citations

  • 610 N.W.2d 321
  • 28 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2473
  • 2000 Minn. LEXIS 279
  • 2000 WL 637021

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining \actual malice\ and noting that \it is important to distinguish between 'actual malice' and 'common law malice' \
  • contrasting actual malice-a \knowing or reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of a statement\-with common law malice-\ill will or improper motive for the publication of defamatory statements\
  • extending fair-report privilege beyond judicial proceedings to reach republishing statements made during city council meetings
  • defining “actual malice” and noting that “it is important to distinguish between ‘actual malice’ and ‘common law malice’”
  • reasoning private figure plaintiff must prove negligence to defeat section 611 privilege
  • “Minnesota law has generally required that in defamation suits, the defamatory matter be set out verbatim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul H. Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.