Moreno v. City of Minneapolis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that application was approved as matter of law even though it was harsh and extraordinary remedy
• stating to rebut the presumption of fraud the fiduciary must produce clear, satisfactory and convincing evidence he acted in good faith and the grantor’s action were free, voluntary, and intelligent
• “When the city fails to adhere to the time limit, the result must be that the application was statutorily approved as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).