Moreland v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that only where the oral pronouncement is ambiguous is there a need for the trial court to make a factual determination before making the correction
• remanding for the trial court to correct the sentencing order to reflect its oral pronouncement
• “This court has consistently held that an oral pronouncement at sentencing prevails over a written order.”
• “Where there is no ambiguity in the trial court’s oral pronouncement, the sentencing order must be corrected, to reflect the oral pronouncement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kenneth Isaac Parkerson v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-04-29· cited 5×
• Gallardo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-01· cited 3×
• Franklin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-19· cited 3×
• Neftali Dominguez Zenon v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-01-10
• Chancery Sturrup v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-06-25

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tory v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-26· cited 25×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-18· cited 6×
• Gibbs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-09· cited 3×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-25· cited 2×
• Anthony v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-28· cited 1×