Moreland v. Devenney
Citations
- 72 Kan. 471
- 83 P. 1097
- 1905 Kan. LEXIS 378
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Attorneys — Champertous Agreement. An agreement of attorneys to carry on a litigation for a share of the amount to be recovered and to pay all costs and expenses is contrary to public policy, champertous, and void, and no re- . covery can be had thereon.</p> <p>2. -Preliminary Oral Negotiations — Implied Contract. Nor can they recover upon a preliminary negotiation which merged into the void written agreement, or upon quantum meruit for the services rendered under the illegal agreement.</p>
Judges: Johnston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Watkins v. SedberrySupreme Court· 1923-04-09· cited 40×
- Greenleaf v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1915-01-09· cited 21×
- Rosenberg v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1938-02-02· cited 20×
- Kansas City Elevated Railway Co. v. ServiceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1908-02-08· cited 15×
- Ridgway v. WetterholdSupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-12-11· cited 10×
- Van Gieson v. MagoonHawaii Supreme Court· 1910-05-04· cited 9×
- Freerks v. NurnbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1916-02-25· cited 7×
- Fisher v. LaneOregon Supreme Court· 1944-04-11· cited 4×
- F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1912-06-08· cited 3×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.