Moreland v. Bradshaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner’s failure to present evidence that a witness’s “testimony would have benefitted” him was “fatal to any attempt to establish that ‘but for counsel’s alleged deficiencies,’ the results of the proceedings would have been different”
• holding that a petitioner’s failure to present evidence that an witness’ “testimony would have benefitted” him is “fatal to any attempt to establish that but for counsel’s alleged deficiencies [in calling the expert], the results of the proceedings would have been different”
• considering, in habeas proceeding, testimony from defense counsel and prosecutors to determine whether defendant's jury waiver was invalid because he was under influence of sodium pentothal
• “Any claim that there was a violation or [sic] Ohio Revised Code § 2945.05 is a question of state law and therefore not a proper ground for habeas relief.”
• petitioner's failure to present evidence that a witness's “testimony would have benefitted” him was “fatal to any attempt to establish that ‘but for counsel's alleged deficiencies,’ the results of the proceedings would have been different”
• certificate of appealability granted Jan. 6, 2010

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).