Morel v. Giuliani

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that degree of harm resulting from City’s delay in restoring public assistance benefits “is made evident by the fact that most changes in benefits are reversed or withdrawn after a hearing.”
• finding irreparable harm where New York City regularly failed to provide “aid continuing” benefits, in violation of federal and state law
• rejecting argument that plaintiffs’ claims are moot because they have received either aid continuing benefits or a notice of decision following a hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).