Moratzka v. Visa U.S.A. (In Re Calstar, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that chargebacks between a debtor’s debit account and a bank are “a series of classic setoffs”
• awarding money damages for a violation of the automatic stay and stating that punitive damages, although generally available under section 105, were not warranted in the case
• “[T]he trustee is entitled, at a minimum, to recover damages equal to the amount of chargebacks that were made in violation of the automatic stay.”
• recovery of chargebacks 22 from postpetition deposit is a violation of § 549 and the 23 automatic stay
• recovery of chargebacks 22 from postpetition deposit is a violation of § 549 and the 23 automatic stay
• stay imposed by former bankruptcy rules was “in effect, an order of the Supreme Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).