Skip to main content
· 12/9/2009

Morasch v. Hood

Citations

  • 222 P.3d 1125
  • 232 Or. App. 392
  • 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1955

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “civil conspiracy is not, itself, a separate tort for which damages may be recovered; rather, it is a ‘way[] in which a person may become jointly liable for another’s tortious conduct.’ ” (alteration in original
  • vacating and remanding enhanced prevailing party fee award in analogous circumstances
  • “Because civil conspiracy is not a separate cause of action, Holloway’s claims should be dismissed with prejudice.”
  • “Although *** the evidence relating to damages was not legally sufficient to sustain the claim for fraud, we cannot conclude *** that plaintiffs’ [fraud] claim was without an objectively reasonable basis.”
  • setting forth elements of a civil conspiracy claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.