Moran v. Kia Motors America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court’s determination of whether a witness is qualified to render an opinion as an expert will not be disturbed absent a manifest abuse of discretion
• factors relevant to analysis under OCGA § 24-9-67.1 (b) include “whether the specialized theory or technique has been or can be tested, the theory’s general acceptance in the expert community, rate of error, and peer review”
• expert testimony as to car’s value excluded where plaintiff did not prove that expert’s testimony was the product of reliable principles and methods or that he had applied them reliably to the facts of the case
• “It is well settled that the determination of whether the witness has established sufficient opportunity for forming a correct opinion, and a proper basis for expressing his opinion, is for the trial court. Absent an abuse of discretion, the trial court’s decision will not be disturbed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).