Skip to main content
· 2/5/2007

Moran Foods, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Mid-Atlantic Market Development Company, Llc, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants

Citations

  • 476 F.3d 436
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2485
  • 2007 WL 316817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jurisdiction existed because the notice of appeal men- tioned the district court’s order that, in effect, brought up for review the court’s earlier quasi-interlocutory order (emphasis added)
  • holding that jurisdiction existed because the notice of appeal men- tioned the district court’s order that, in effect, brought up for review the court’s earlier quasi-interlocutory order (emphasis added)
  • “[I]t is apparent that what the Act was intended to do was to forbid a creditor to deny credit to a [married] woman on the basis of a belief that she would not be a good credit risk.”
  • “[W]hat the Act was intended to do was forbid a creditor to deny credit to a woman on the basis of a belief that she would not be a good credit risk because she would be distracted by child care or some other stereotypically female responsibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.