· 8/4/2003
Morales-Vallellanes v. United States Postal
Citations
- 339 F.3d 9
- 56 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 529
- 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3207
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15513
- 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,536
- 2003 WL 21782296
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that district courts must take some affirmative action 14 to convert 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss supported by extraneous materials into a summary 15 judgment motion
- noting that these are “three separate levels of inquiry”
- “[Plaintiffs] Title VII cause of action is limited to those discrimination and retaliation allegations in his amended complaint that were previously the subject of a formal EEO complaint.”
- \A complaint need not point to the appropriate statute or law in order to raise a claim for relief\
- no hostile work environment where colleagues told used the phrase 18 “China Man,” pulled eyes back with fingers to mock appearance of Asians, and ridiculed 19 plaintiff for word mispronunciation
- courts have a duty to construe pro se pleadings and motions liberally
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Selya, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.