Skip to main content
· 8/4/2003

Morales-Vallellanes v. United States Postal

Citations

  • 339 F.3d 9
  • 56 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 529
  • 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3207
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15513
  • 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,536
  • 2003 WL 21782296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that district courts must take some affirmative action 14 to convert 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss supported by extraneous materials into a summary 15 judgment motion
  • noting that these are “three separate levels of inquiry”
  • “[Plaintiffs] Title VII cause of action is limited to those discrimination and retaliation allegations in his amended complaint that were previously the subject of a formal EEO complaint.”
  • \A complaint need not point to the appropriate statute or law in order to raise a claim for relief\
  • no hostile work environment where colleagues told used the phrase 18 “China Man,” pulled eyes back with fingers to mock appearance of Asians, and ridiculed 19 plaintiff for word mispronunciation
  • courts have a duty to construe pro se pleadings and motions liberally

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Selya, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.