Skip to main content
· 12/30/1999

Morales v. Fail Safe, Inc.

Citations

  • 311 Ill. App. 3d 231
  • 724 N.E.2d 174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Dramshop Act has no common-law counterpart
  • “[t]he one-year proviso of the Dramshop Act is not a statute of limitations; it is a condition precedent to the right of recovery which must be observed by all plaintiffs in order to bring themselves within the coverage of the Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.