· 12/30/1999
Morales v. Fail Safe, Inc.
Citations
- 311 Ill. App. 3d 231
- 724 N.E.2d 174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the Dramshop Act has no common-law counterpart
- “[t]he one-year proviso of the Dramshop Act is not a statute of limitations; it is a condition precedent to the right of recovery which must be observed by all plaintiffs in order to bring themselves within the coverage of the Act”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.