Morabito v. Blum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the “well-settled” practice of dismissing pursuant to Rule 8(a)(2) a complaint that “names a defendant in the caption but contains no allegations indicating how the defendant violated the law or injured the plaintiff”
• describing the “well-settled” practice of dismissing pursuant to Rule 3 8(a)(2) a complaint that “names a defendant in the caption but contains no allegations 4 indicating how the defendant violated the law or injured the plaintiff”
• Medicaid recipients may bring a section 1983 action in federal court to challenge noncompliance with medical care advisory committee regulation
• Medicaid recipients may bring a section 1983 action in federal court to challenge noncompliance with medical care advisory committee regulation
• program enjoined until agency complied with sixty day notice period
• when a “complaint names a defendant in the caption but contains no allegations indicating how the defendant violated the law or injured the plaintiff,” the plaintiff fails to state a plausible claim to relief against that defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).