District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/15/2017
Mora v. State
Citations
- 211 So. 3d 308
- 2017 WL 608287
- 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1996
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that reversal was not required because the prosecutor’s improper “comments were isolated and not pervasive” and the “evidence of guilt was overwhelming”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Suarez, Lagoa, Salter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sampson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-15· cited 6×
- Charles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-11-07· cited 2×
- Scala and Weitz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-15· cited 1×
- Travis R. Brown v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-08-22
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ruiz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-04-01· cited 108×
- Merck v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-12-06· cited 106×
- Braddy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-11-15· cited 96×
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-05· cited 45×
- Hitchcock v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-03-23· cited 31×
- Ana Maria Cardona v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-02-18· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.