Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/6/2000

Mora v. Industrial Commission

Citations

726 N.E.2d 650
312 Ill. App. 3d 266
244 Ill. Dec. 675
2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 131
2000 WL 249239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying Code and cases interpreting same, specifically section 2-616, to determine that amendment of application to name additional respondents after hearing before arbitrator was improper because it worked a prejudicial affect upon substantive rights of respondents
applying Code and cases interpreting same, specifically section 2 — 616, to determine that amendment of application to name additional respondents after hearing before arbitrator was improper because it worked a prejudicial effect upon substantive rights of respondents
“It is well established that ‘[t]he rules of statutory construction apply when interpreting an agency regulation.” (Citing Roberto v. Dep’t of Navy, 440 F.3d 1341, 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
When construing an administrative rule, the court stated “[i]t is a basic tenet of statutory construction that a statute should be construed so that no word or phrase is rendered superfluous or meaningless”
When construing an administrative rule, the court stated \[i]t is a basic tenet of statutory construction that a statute should be construed so that no word or phrase is rendered superfluous or meaningless\
discussing amendment of an application for adjustment of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.