Skip to main content
· 10/19/1981

Moorehead v. Arnold

Citations

  • 637 P.2d 305
  • 130 Ariz. 503
  • 1981 Ariz. App. LEXIS 573

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The promise of confidentiality standing alone is not sufficient to preclude disclosure. If the promise of confidentiality were to end our inquiry, we would be allowing a city official to eliminate the public’s rights under A.R.S. [§] 39-121.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdsall, Hathaway, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.