Skip to main content

Moore v. Weinberg

Citations

  • 681 S.E.2d 875
  • 383 S.C. 583
  • 2009 S.C. LEXIS 361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a duty under the facts of the case that arose \from an attorney's role as an escrow agent and is independent of an attorney's status as a lawyer and distinct from duties that arise out of the attorney/client relationship\
  • finding conflicting testimony regarding the ownership of an interest in the proceeds from litigation created a genuine issue of material fact as to the conversion claim
  • explaining a conversion claim requires the defendant “assum[ed] and exercise[d] . . . the right of ownership over goods or personal chattels belonging to another to the exclusion of the owner’s rights.”
  • “Money may be the subject of conversion when it is capable of being identified and there may be conversion of determinate sums even though the specific coins and bills are not identified.” (citation omitted)
  • \Conversion is defined as the unauthorized assumption and exercise of the right of ownership over goods or personal chattels belonging to another to the exclusion of the owner's rights.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Waller, Beatty, Moore, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.