Moore v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “store 1 Because the parties are familiar with the facts and the procedural history, we do not recount them here. 2 owners would essentially incur strict liability for slip-and-fall injuries” if not for the notice requirement
• “In the absence of actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition, the owner is not liable.”
• “[I]t is still the plaintiff who has the burden of producing evidence and who must prove that the owner had constructive notice of the hazardous condition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).