Skip to main content
· 3/19/1885

Moore v. Ullman

Citations

  • 80 Va. 307
  • 1885 Va. LEXIS 68

Syllabus

<p>1. FRAUD-PrOQ/-CLZSe a/ bar.-The evidence of fraud must be sufficient to satisfy the conscience of the court, but may, and generally must, be circumstantial. In the case here by such evidence fraud is proved.</p> <p>2. PRACTICE IN CHANcERY-AflSWerS.---The testimony of one witness, with corroborative circumstances, or circumstances alone, or documentary evidence alone, may overcome an answer that is responsive to the aver-ments of the bill. Jones v. Abraham, 75 Va. 4613.</p>

Judges: Lacy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.