Moore v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it was not impermissibly suggestive to have the defendant pictured in clothing similar to that described by the witness
• holding it was not impermissibly suggestive to have the defendant pictured in clothing similar to that described by the witness
• identification challenges are reviewed for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bishop v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-09-28· cited 38×
• Travis v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-05-05· cited 32×
• Hutcherson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2001-06-06· cited 16×
• State v. Garza
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 15×
• Vann Bragg v. State of Arkansas
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2023-04-20· cited 13×
• King v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-02-26· cited 12×
• State v. Christensen
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-07-08· cited 6×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• McConaughy v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-02-26· cited 34×