Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 673 A.2d 171
  • 1996 Del. LEXIS 131
  • 1996 WL 144226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acquitted of theft, but loss considered “a direct result of” burglary and conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berger, Chandler, Hartnett, Veasey, Walsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.