Supreme Court of Delaware· 3/27/1996
Moore v. State
Citations
- 673 A.2d 171
- 1996 Del. LEXIS 131
- 1996 WL 144226
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acquitted of theft, but loss considered “a direct result of” burglary and conspiracy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berger, Chandler, Hartnett, Veasey, Walsh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Walter E. Brewer and Brian E. HonelTenth Circuit· 1993-01-05· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. MathisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-22· cited 48×
- Brewer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-05-17· cited 30×
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-02-25· cited 22×
- Pratt v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-15· cited 16×
- People v. HouseAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-07-28· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.