Moore v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• closing argument regarding a surveillance video was not improper since it merely drew reasonable deductions from the evidence admitted and presented at trial
• “in the situation in which the State maintains that it needs the presence of the primary investigator for the orderly presentation of the case, excepting the investigator from the rule of sequestration is within the discretion of the trial court”
• “in the situation in which the State maintains that it needs the presence of the primary investigator for the orderly 7 presentation of the case, excepting the investigator from the rule of sequestration is within the discretion of the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thompson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-06-01· cited 16×
• Upshaw v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-01-23· cited 3×
• Quiktrip Corporation v. Patricia Robinson
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2026-06-23

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Scott v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-04-24· cited 130×
• Holloman v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-07-02· cited 20×