Moore v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “it is improper to enhance a sentence 26 for conspiracy using the deadly weapon enhancement.”
• holding that \it is improper to enhance a sentence for conspiracy using the deadly weapon enhancement.\
• finding that, unlike California, Nevada does not require an overt act and that the crime of conspiracy is therefore completed when the unlawful agreement is reached

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Butler v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-12-20· cited 66×
• Haney v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 27×
• State of Arizona v. Marcus Deshaun Tucker, Clifton James Cuttler II and Andre Lavelle Armstrong
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-12-24· cited 27×
• Clancy v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2013-11-27· cited 24×
• Schuster v. Eighth Judicial District Court
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2007-06-28· cited 23×
• Savage v. Third Judicial District Court
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2009-01-29· cited 18×
• Brooks v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-04-03· cited 14×
• Ryan Moore v. Don Helling
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-08-15· cited 13×
• Dettloff v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-09-16· cited 13×
• Nunnery v. Eighth Judicial District Court
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-07-03· cited 11×
• RICHARDSON
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 2010-07-01· cited 8×
• Zabeti v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-09-03· cited 6×
• Kirkpatrick v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-07-20· cited 2×
• Harlan (Kody) v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2022-02-17