Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 882 S.W.2d 844
  • 1994 WL 284562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellate courts must presume that instructions to the jury “are efficacious”
  • holding that appellate courts must presume that instructions to the jury \are efficacious\
  • holding that the instruction cured the harm from a racially suggestive question
  • articles 36.03-.04 were repealed by Act effective Aug. 26,1985, 69th Leg., R.S., ch. 685, § 9(b), 1985 Tex.Gen.Laws 2472, 2474
  • error to permit expert witnesses to remain in courtroom during trial absent proof that an exception applied
  • new evidence was at most cumulative of other evidence of victim's alleged drug usage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Clinton, State, Miller, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

153 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.