Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 874 S.W.2d 671
  • 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 33
  • 1994 WL 90561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that jury must indicate its disagreement as to the statement of a witness in order to have the testimony in dispute read to the jury
  • rejecting trial court’s reasoning: “You know they disagree or they wouldn’t ask”
  • rejecting trial court’s reasoning: “You know they disagree or they wouldn’t ask”
  • rejecting trial court's reasoning: \You know they disagree or they wouldn't ask\
  • “A simple request for testimony does not, by itself, reflect disagreement, implicit or express, and is not a proper request under Art. 36.28.” (internal citations omitted)
  • applying Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 36.28 (West 1981)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.