Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 295 S.W.3d 329
  • 2009 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 880
  • 2009 WL 1873493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court’s “improper intrusion into plea-bargaining process” is subject to requirements of Rule 33.1
  • concluding that the appellant failed to preserve error by failing to object that the trial court's additional conditions to a plea-bargain agreement were improper
  • recognizing that “[o]nly the state may offer or withdraw a plea bargain” but “[i]f the trial court accepts a plea-bargain agreement, the state may not withdraw its offer.”
  • holding that “[p]reservation of error is a systemic requirement of every appeal”
  • noting that if trial court accepts plea bargain, defendant entitled to enforcement of its terms
  • holding appellant failed to preserve issue because he did not object to trial court’s allegedly improper intrusion into plea- bargaining process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Keller, Keasler, Holcomb, Cochran, Price, Womack, Meyers, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

113 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.