District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/12/2000
Moore v. State
Citations
- 748 So. 2d 1094
- 2000 WL 27544
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he habitual offender statute does not prohibit habitualization where the offense at conviction is sale of a controlled substance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cope, Green and Fletcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bunkley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-05-27· cited 17×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-15· cited 4×
- Torres v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-09· cited 2×
- RICHARD H. MORRISON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-11-27
- Hampton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-23
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Judge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-20· cited 145×
- Bover v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-28· cited 25×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-07· cited 9×
- Freshman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-17· cited 8×
- Botelho v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-18· cited 6×
- Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-16· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.