Mississippi Supreme Court· 6/19/1972
Moore v. State
Citations
- 264 So. 2d 414
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that even though indictment cited statute that did not become effective until after alleged crime was committed there was no error where action was criminal prior to statutory change and penalty did not change
- holding that even though indictment cited statute that did not become effective until after alleged crime was committed there was no error where action was criminal prior to statutory change and penalty did not change
- specifically noting that Ex Post Facto Clause was not implicated
- specifically noting that Ex Post Facto Clause was not implicated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Inzer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Spears v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2006-11-16· cited 30×
- Toney v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1974-08-12· cited 18×
- Wolf v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1973-04-27· cited 17×
- Cowan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1981-05-27· cited 15×
- Wilkins v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 8×
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1973-05-28· cited 4×
- Brown v. McCoyMississippi Supreme Court· 1978-08-23· cited 4×
- State v. Michael RondeauSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-11-18· cited 3×
- Kyzar v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1972-12-18· cited 2×
- Shelton v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1973-03-12· cited 1×
- Brian Spears v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2004-03-18
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.