Moore v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that positive identification by single employee of store was sufficient to support conviction for felony theft
• holding store employee's identification of appellant as thief was sufficient to uphold conviction
• positive identification by only one employee of store was A ample evidence @ to support conviction of felony theft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-10-24· cited 37×
• Ex Parte Brown
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-03-15· cited 35×
• Garza v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-08-08· cited 28×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-10-12· cited 12×
• Salas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-11-29· cited 3×
• Ford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-08-06· cited 3×
• Raymond Ramirez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-08-31
• Daryl Jerome Robinson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-12-13
• Joshua Alexandro Ramon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2007-09-19
• Homero Garza v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-08-08
• Kaio, Thomas Marvin v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-07-10
• Wilson, Paul Emile v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-02-19

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Gordzelik v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1952-01-23· cited 1×