Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 340 S.E.2d 888
  • 255 Ga. 519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing the defendant’s murder conviction because the evidence presented at trial showed only “that he had a motive for the killing; that he was present during the killing; and that he fled thereafter,” and was thus not sufficient as a matter of due process
  • insufficient evidence that appellant was a party to the crime of murder notwithstanding that he had motive
  • some circumstantial evidence of motive, presence, and flight but no direct evidence that defendant was even present at time of murder
  • evidence was insufficient where it was only circumstantial and showed merely that defendant had motive to kill victim, was present at scene of crime, and fled from scene
  • some circumstantial evidence of motive, presence, and flight but no direct evidence that defendant was even present at time of murder
  • In both Brown and Moore, the Supreme Court reversed the appellant’s murder conviction because the cir cumstantial evidence failed to show the requisite shared criminal intent.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.