District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/5/2006
Moore v. State
Citations
- 943 So. 2d 296
- 2006 WL 3486812
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a trial judge did not abuse its discretion by allowing three witnesses to testify concerning the child’s hearsay statements
- holding that where the appellant introduced exculpatory statements that he made to police officer, his credibility could be attacked just as if he had testified as a witness
- finding no abuse of discretion in the admission of evidence of similar acts of child molestation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kaczmar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-10-04· cited 23×
- MARK GORDON ANDERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-18· cited 10×
- Mathis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-21· cited 6×
- Bass v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-31· cited 5×
- Gabriel Brian Nock v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2018-11-01· cited 1×
- McCullum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-03
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.