Moore v. Shoreline Ventures, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment in favor of defendants as to Dram Shop Act claim because “Ginsel was not provided, sold, or served alcoholic beverages”
• “In the instant case, there is no special relationship between the bar and Ginsel. Ginsel did not buy anything at the bar; nor did he consume any alcoholic beverages while on the premises. He was not a customer, an employee, a child, or any other relation which might give rise to a duty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).