Moore v. Sandusky Bldg. Code Bd. of Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that IDEA ensures “appropriate education, not one that provides everything that might be thought desirable by loving parents” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that \[t]he right to public education is not fundamental\
• finding that IDEA “guarantees . . . an appropriate education, not one that provides everything that might be thought desirable by loving parents”
• holding that “[t]he right to public education is not fundamental”
• noting that there is no fundamental or substantive due process right to public education
• rejecting a procedural due process claim where the challenged policy did “not prevent . . . children from obtaining a public education, even if, as Plaintiffs allege, these children would receive a better education if aversive interventions were permitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).