Skip to main content
· 6/15/1906

Moore v. Rush

Citations

  • 52 Fla. 369

Syllabus

<p>Under the issue of the statute of limitations in assumpsit for goods sold, it is error to admit in evidence a promise under seal to pay interest on monthly hills executed in advance of the sale of the goods.</p>

Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.