Moore v. Revlon Consumer Prods. Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while there is support for both a narrow and broad reading of “exceeds authorized access,” the rule of lenity requires the court to adopt a narrower interpretation in the defendant’s favor
• holding that while there is support for both a narrow and broad reading of “exceeds authorized access,” the rule of lenity requires the court to adopt a narrower interpretation in the defendant’s favor
• holding that while there is support for both a narrow and broad reading of “exceeds authorized access,” the rule of lenity requires the court to adopt a narrower interpretation in the defendant’s favor
• recognizing the circuit split and noting that this sharp division means that the statute is readily susceptible to different interpretations
• involving police officer charged with violating ■section 1030(a)(2)(B) for accessing a government computer for a non-law enforcement purpose
• discussing the difficulty of distinguishing between \fantasy chats\ with no actual intent to commit crimes and \real chats\ containing criminal intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).