Moore v. Pavex, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that \there could be no recovery for economic loss by the plaintiffs in this case who did not suffer physical harm to property in which they had a proprietary interest\
• ruling that “there could be no recovery for economic loss by the plaintiffs in this case who did not suffer physical harm to property in which they had a proprietary interest”
• rejecting the contention that plaintiffs could recover under the law of private nuisance for purely economic harm
• rejecting the contention that plaintiffs could recover under the law of private nuisance for purely economic harm
• affirming trial court’s determination that “there could be no recovery for economic loss by the plaintiffs in this case who did not suffer physical harm to property in which they had a proprietary interest”
• discussing why liability cannot extend to those with solely economic losses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).