Moore v. Olcott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a district court is not required to discuss each of the factors on the record”
• holding this factor weighed against dismissal where plaintiffs were not given an opportunity to be heard on dismissal for failure to prosecute, as opposed to other reasons for dismissal
• explaining that in applying the first factor, the court should consider “(1) whether the failures to prosecute were those of the plaintiff; and (2) whether these failures were of significant duration”
• explaining that in applying the first factor, the court should consider “(1) whether the failures to prosecute were those of the plaintiff; and (2) whether these failures were of significant duration”
• noting that plaintiffs may challenge the defendant’s performance of a class action settlement through disparate mechanisms including “in a contempt proceeding (if the claim is that the district court’s orders are not being complied with
• distinguishing between revocation of pro hac vice admission, which is a sanction and therefore triggers due process protection, and denial of admission, which does not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).