Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 8/8/2014
Moore v. Moore
Citations
- 160 So. 3d 325
- 2014 WL 3890718
- 2014 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that past-due installments of support become judgments on the date they are due and that they may be collected through garnishment proceedings without need of a new judgment
- explaining that past-due installments of support become judgments on the date they are due and that they may be collected through garnishment proceedings without need of a new judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donaldson, Moore, Pittman, Thomas, Thompson, Writing
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eubanks v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama· 1999-11-05· cited 101×
- Ex Parte MorganSupreme Court of Alabama· 1983-09-23· cited 29×
- Cartron v. CartronCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1990-06-06· cited 7×
- Robbins v. State ex rel. PriddyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2012-10-26· cited 4×
- Lewis v. Colonial Bank of AlabamaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1988-01-13· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.