Moore v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An award of alimony must be based on the income that is available to the party, i.e., the party’s net monthly income.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• RYAN MATTHEW TRITSCHLER v. HOLLY MARIE TRITSCHLER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-07· cited 8×
• Hanson v. Hanson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-28· cited 8×
• Conlin v. Conlin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-01· cited 5×
• GINA K. PERSAUD v. DHANIRAM DANNY PERSAUD
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-09
• GINA K. PERSAUD v. DHANIRAM DANNY PERSAUD
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-18
• Marcheck v. Marcheck
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-03-27
• RYAN CROUSE v. NANCY L. CROUSE
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-07-26
• STACEY PARKER v. JUSTIN PARKER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-01-17

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Zold v. Zold
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-09-15· cited 39×
• McCants v. McCants
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-09· cited 23×
• Trespalacios v. Trespalacios
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-09· cited 4×
• Coppola v. Coppola
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-19· cited 4×
• Cissel v. Cissel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-22· cited 2×