· 10/17/1984
Moore v. Maloney
Citations
- 321 S.E.2d 335
- 253 Ga. 504
- 1984 Ga. LEXIS 977
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding rezoning decision where “the city council clearly ignored the requirements of the city zoning ordinance regarding comprehensive development plans”
- appellants produced evidence that their property value would decline if seven townhouses were erected on the adjacent lot
- adjacent property owners had substantial interest in rezoning action because any change in use of rezoned property would affect adjacent property first
- landowners had standing to challenge rezoning decision although townhouses not built
- landowners had standing to challenge rezoning decision although townhouses not built
- property owners had standing to challenge zoning decision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.