Skip to main content
· 10/17/1984

Moore v. Maloney

Citations

  • 321 S.E.2d 335
  • 253 Ga. 504
  • 1984 Ga. LEXIS 977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding rezoning decision where “the city council clearly ignored the requirements of the city zoning ordinance regarding comprehensive development plans”
  • appellants produced evidence that their property value would decline if seven townhouses were erected on the adjacent lot
  • adjacent property owners had substantial interest in rezoning action because any change in use of rezoned property would affect adjacent property first
  • landowners had standing to challenge rezoning decision although townhouses not built
  • landowners had standing to challenge rezoning decision although townhouses not built
  • property owners had standing to challenge zoning decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.