Skip to main content
· 9/14/2001

Moore v. Hartley Motors, Inc.

Citations

  • 36 P.3d 628
  • 2001 Alas. LEXIS 126
  • 2001 WL 1075681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that although release did not violate public policy, the scope of the release did not include liability for general negligence
  • concluding that although release did not violate public policy, the scope of the release did not include liability for general negligence
  • concluding that the release plaintiff signed to participate in an ATV safety class was not void for public policy in part because the Legislature chose not to regulate ATV course operators in the same way as other industries
  • concluding that the release plaintiff signed to participate in an ATV safety class was not void for public policy in part because the legislature chose not to regulate ATV course operators in the same way as other industries
  • noting that ATV riding is similar to parachuting, dirt biking, and scuba diving, for which releases have been upheld in other jurisdictions
  • defining inherent risks of sport as dangers that could not be eliminated through exercise of reasonable care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.