Skip to main content
· 4/25/1991

Moore v. Grossman

Citations

  • 824 P.2d 7
  • 15 Brief Times Rptr. 536
  • 1991 Colo. App. LEXIS 119
  • 1991 WL 64152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a district court always retains jurisdiction to enforce 11 and give effect to the terms of a judgment
  • explaining that courts should “reject the approach that ‘pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep . . . may be decisive to the outcome’” (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 48 (1957))
  • exemplifying the manner in which the statement of issues may be presented to the 16 jury
  • where motion to amend and proposed amended complaint filed and served prior to expiration of statute of limitations, “statute is tolled until the trial court rules on the motion”
  • “To prevail on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim, [the] 11 defendant must first demonstrate that had his counsel moved for severance, the motion 12 would have been granted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Metzger, Plank, Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.