· 4/25/1991
Moore v. Grossman
Citations
- 824 P.2d 7
- 15 Brief Times Rptr. 536
- 1991 Colo. App. LEXIS 119
- 1991 WL 64152
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a district court always retains jurisdiction to enforce 11 and give effect to the terms of a judgment
- explaining that courts should “reject the approach that ‘pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep . . . may be decisive to the outcome’” (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 48 (1957))
- exemplifying the manner in which the statement of issues may be presented to the 16 jury
- where motion to amend and proposed amended complaint filed and served prior to expiration of statute of limitations, “statute is tolled until the trial court rules on the motion”
- “To prevail on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim, [the] 11 defendant must first demonstrate that had his counsel moved for severance, the motion 12 would have been granted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Metzger, Plank, Rothenberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.